Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://research.academicanalytical.com/jspui/handle/1471/17
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGray, Cameron C.-
dc.contributor.authorMansoor, Sa'ad P.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T15:28:33Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-05T15:28:33Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.shadowraider.com/jspui/handle/1471/17-
dc.description.abstractThe Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), the de facto standard protocol for Internet routing, only passes on the ‘best’ path for every Internet destination. As such, some connections between ISPs are entirely masked. If a network does not announce any routes of its own, the entire network could be masked as well. Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) exist to record connections among all ISPs in an attempt to combat this effect. This paper examines how prevalent this masked link/network effect is and how well documented the connections between ISPs are in the European IRR. The result is that there is a relatively small number of discrepancies when comparing the data within a source, for example the IRR data. When sources are compared with each other a much larger number is uncovered.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectIRRen_GB
dc.subjectdata qualityen_GB
dc.subjectinternet routingen_GB
dc.subjectanalysisen_GB
dc.titleFinding the Invisible: A Comparison of IRR Data and Routing Pathwaysen_GB
dc.typePreprinten_GB
Appears in Collections:Submitted Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Finding_the_Invisible__A_Comparison_of_IRR_Data_and_Routing_Pathways.pdfPaper Pre-print263.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.